New Substantive Revision to the SEP Entry on the Epistemology of Modality

 Here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two Pictures of a World's Structure; Two Views on the Scope of Modal Knowledge

Rough Draft. First Picture: At the fundamental level of reality, all that exists are point-sized objects bearing wholly intrinsic properties. All else supervenes on the fundamental level.  Second picture: At the fundamental level of reality, a significant number of things exist that are interdependent, interlocking, interrelated. A significant number of essential properties at this level are relational properties. The first picture warrants confidence in wide scope for modal knowledge. For on that view, one can generate a new possible world merely by adding, subtracting, and recombining the base-level entities in virtually any way you like without the threat that a given recombination is impossible.  By contrast, the second picture doesn't warrant antecedent confidence in wide scope for modal knowledge. For on that view, lots of recombinations are ruled out as impossible. Which picture is correct? As recently pointed out by French and McKenzie (among others) current evidence ...
Read more

Van Inwagen's Nod to John Seddon

Much recent work in the epistemology of modality acknowledges the challenge of Peter van Inwagen's mitigated modal skepticism, especially as presented in his celebrated 1998  Phil. Studies paper, "Modal Epistemology". Furthermore, many have attempted to grapple with van Inwagen's arguments in that paper. Despite this, not many note van Inwagen's not-infrequent reference to John Seddon's 1972 Mind paper, "Logical Possibility" as an important source of his skepticism about modal claims remote from ordinary experience.  This is significant, since (i) a common criticism is that van Inwagen's mitigated modal skepticism isn't sufficiently warranted, since he fails to motivate a presumption against modal claims remote from ordinary experience, and (ii) van Inwagen alludes to the arguments in Seddon's paper as a core basis for such a presumption. The aim of this post is thus to exposit the main points of Seddon's paper. The hope is that it ...
Read more

Summary of Fiocco's "Conceivability, Imagination, and Modal Knowledge": Classic Papers in Modal Epistemology Series

Fiocco (2007) critiques conceivability-based accounts of modal epistemology, concluding with a brief defense of rational intuition as the source of modal knowledge (cf. Van Cleve, Tidman, and Bealer). The paper can be divided into three main parts.  In the first, Fiocco quickly rehearses standard counterexamples to conceivability as understandability, entertainability, believability, etc. we've seen from, e.g.  Tidman  and  Yablo , concluding with special focus on Tidman's "What Counts?" objection to imagination-based accounts.  The second focuses on Yablo's imagination-based account of conceivability (with limited discussion of Chalmers' account as well). Fiocco argues that while Yablo's account avoids the "What Counts?" objection, it falls prey to a "Which Worlds?" objection (one he attributes to both Yablo and van Inwagen). The core of the objection is that Yablo-style objectually imagined worlds are  purely qualitative  in character...
Read more