New Substantive Revision to the SEP Entry on the Epistemology of Modality

 Here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Yablo's "Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility?": Classic Papers in Modal Epistemology Series

The publication of Yablo's 1993 PPR paper, "Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility?" is widely considered a watershed in the history of the epistemology of modality. It's perhaps the most widely cited paper in the subfield to date. And while the subfield has progressed considerably since its publication, it still repays revisiting. And given the blog's aims, I've typed up a fairly careful outline of Yablo's paper. There are still some gaps, so I'll come back in due course to fill them in. 1. Introduction 1.1. Some statements express true propositions about what is metaphysically possible; others do not. 1.2. How can we tell the difference between the two? 1.3. The standard philosophical answer is captured by Hume’s maxim regarding conceivability-possibility inferences:  1.4. Hume’s (modal epistemology) Maxim: “‘Tis an establish'd maxim in metaphysics, that whatever the mind clearly conceives, includes the idea of possible existence, or...
Read more

Chalmers' Modal Epistemology

 1. Concepts 1.1 Primary vs. secondary intensions According to Chalmers’ two-dimensionalism (henceforth 2D), each concept has two components: a primary intension and a secondary intension.   The primary intension of a concept is a function from scenarios to extensions.  Very roughly, a scenario is a comprehensive, consistent hypothesis of a way the actual world could turn out to be that’s not ruled out by what you know a priori.   Thus, consider the hypothesis H that the actual world is one in which everything is the way I believe it to be, except that the stuff that plays the watery role is not H20, but rather XYZ. I can’t rule it out from what I know a priori that H accurately describes the world I live in; H is therefore a scenario.  Now with the notion of a scenario in mind, consider the concept, water.  The primary intension of water is a function from scenarios to extensions, and thus picks out the class of things that, for all I know a priori, can pl...
Read more

Descartes' Modal Epistemology

Rough draft. In progress. In what follows, I will explicate what I call ‘the Cartesian Package’.  The Cartesian Package provides the basis for Descartes’ unique account of modal epistemology.  It has two main components: an account of the nature of objects and an account of forming adequate conceptions of them.   Take the former component first.  Given Descartes’ account of homogeneous objects, every object has a structure of properties that are related to one another in a way that’s crucial for his modal epistemology, as we will see.  First, they have a principal attribute, which is the most general and fundamental feature of an object.  This feature is a determinable, and it specifies the kind of object that a thing is, and all of the other sorts of properties that the thing can have.  Descartes, of course, took extension to be the principal attribute of material objects.   Second, objects have other attributes that flow necessarily and transpar...
Read more